THIS film, a sequel to 28 Days Later, starts six months after the Rage virus spread throughout the British Isles.
The US Army has restored order and helps to secure a small area of London for the survivors to repopulate and start again.
But when a carrier of the virus enters London and unknowingly re-ignites the spread of the deadly infection, all hell breaks lose.
Up until this point the film is very good but the way in which the infected person is allowed to contaminate someone else, therefore starting the problem again, is just too unbelievable.
As is the way that all the infected people are able to break through the Army's inpenatrable defences and escape.
The film then follows a small band of survivors who fall under the protection of an Army sharpshooter.
Slowly and predictably the gang are picked off one by one until only the two cute children remain.
Because the film is a sequel to the brilliant 28 Days Later (by Danny Boyle and Alex Garland) which was done so well this was almost bound to fall short.
It's less believable then the first film and losses some of the dread and unknown by having people from outside Britain know what's going on.
However, if you're a fan of horror films and really like your gore then you should enjoy it.
BR
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article